Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Sign up to get it in your inbox.

#04|systems|7 min

The systems that scale without you

You can't grow by adding hours. But you can grow by codifying what's in your head into systems that others can operate. Here's where to start this week.

A consultant I respect told me recently that his practice hit a ceiling at $450K. Not because of demand. Because every engagement required him personally for every deliverable. This edition is about breaking that dependency. The codification framework in the Value Creation section is something I've seen transform solo practices into scalable operations in under 6 months.

Francis Beaulieu

Francis Beaulieu

Why this matters right now

The consulting market is bifurcating. On one side: solo practitioners competing on personal reputation and hourly availability. On the other: practice owners who've built delivery systems, knowledge assets, and recurring revenue streams. The gap between these two models is widening every quarter, and AI is accelerating the divergence. A solo consultant augmented by AI and systems can now deliver what used to require a 5-person team. But only if the systems exist.

Pricing: The hybrid fee structure

The action: Structure your next engagement as a base fee (70% of your normal project fee) plus a success fee (20-30% of the measurable value created, capped at 2x the base fee).

Why it works: The base fee covers your cost of delivery. The success fee aligns incentives and, critically, gives you a reason to stay involved post-delivery to measure outcomes. That measurement relationship often becomes a retainer.

Philip Morgan, positioning consultant and author of The Positioning Manual, argues that hybrid structures act as client qualification filters: the clients who agree to outcome-based components are systematically the ones with executive sponsorship, measurable goals, and implementation capacity. The fee structure selects for better clients.

This week: Model the hybrid structure for your current engagement. What's the base? What's the measurable outcome? What's the success fee? Even if you don't propose it this time, having the model ready changes how you think about pricing.

Sales & Business Development: The contrarian thought piece

The action: Write one 800-word piece that takes a widely held assumption in your clients' industry and demonstrates, with evidence, that it's wrong.

The formula: Not "5 tips for better operations." Instead: "Why the lean initiatives that 70% of mid-market manufacturers adopted in 2024 are creating the exact bottleneck they intended to solve." This requires genuine intellectual work. You need to identify a pattern from your engagements that contradicts conventional wisdom.

Lenny Rachitsky's newsletter Lenny's Newsletter has built a massive audience using exactly this formula: take a common belief, show the data that challenges it, and provide the alternative. One piece of this calibre generates more qualified inbound than 50 generic LinkedIn posts.

This week: Open a document. Write the sentence: "Most people in [industry] believe [assumption]. Here's why that's wrong." Fill in the blanks from your last 5 engagements. You have the contrarian insight already. It's just not written down.

Collaborative Networks: The revenue-sharing joint venture

The action: Identify one recurring engagement type that requires capabilities beyond yours. Propose a formal JV to a complementary consultant: shared offering, single contract, pre-defined revenue split (40/40/20 where 20% covers coordination and joint BD).

The economics: Separately, you each pursue $50K-$80K engagements. Together, you can credibly pursue $120K-$200K engagements because the combined capability matches what clients typically source from mid-tier firms.

The governance essentials: Written JV agreement covering: IP ownership (each retains pre-existing IP, jointly developed IP is co-owned), client relationship ownership (the originator is the primary account owner), and dissolution terms for in-progress engagements.

Chris Do, founder of The Futur, has been vocal about the JV model as the future of creative and consulting services. His argument: the traditional firm model is losing to fluid, specialist-led teams that assemble for specific opportunities.

This week: Message one complementary consultant: "I keep seeing opportunities that need your expertise alongside mine. Want to explore a joint offering?"

Value Creation: Codify your first framework

The action: Name and document the diagnostic process you use at the start of every engagement. The one that lives in your head. Give it a name. Write the 5-7 questions, the scoring criteria, and the interpretation guidelines.

Why this is the highest-leverage activity in your practice: A codified methodology creates three forms of leverage simultaneously. (1) Delivery leverage: others can use it without your presence. (2) Pricing leverage: a named framework commands a premium over generic consulting. (3) Valuation leverage: a practice with proprietary IP sells for 3-5x revenue. One without sells for nothing.

David C. Baker's work on expertise positioning in The Business of Expertise makes the case that codification is the single most important activity a senior consultant can undertake. Not because it changes what you do. Because it changes what you can sell, delegate, and eventually exit.

This week: Open a document titled "[Your Name] [Domain] Diagnostic." Write the first 5 questions you ask every new client. That's the beginning of your codified IP.

AI: Automate your client monitoring and become the advisor who never misses a signal

The action: Set up a structured AI monitoring pipeline for your active clients. Combine Perplexity for real-time intelligence, Claude Projects for client context, and a simple weekly automation (even a calendar reminder) to synthesize.

Why this goes beyond basic AI use: Most consultants check LinkedIn for client news. The advanced play is building a persistent monitoring system that cross-references client developments against your engagement context. When a client's competitor makes an acquisition, your AI system doesn't just flag the news. It analyzes implications for your client's specific strategic position based on everything you've documented about their constraints, goals, and competitive vulnerabilities.

The workflow: Create a Claude Project per active client. Upload your engagement notes, strategic context, and key decisions. Every Monday: (1) Ask Perplexity for "[client company] news last 7 days" and "[competitor names] strategic moves." (2) Feed the results into the client's Claude Project. (3) Ask: "Given everything you know about this client's strategic priorities, which of these developments warrants a proactive advisory note?" (4) If the answer is yes, send the client a 3-line email with the insight.

Simon Willison has documented at simonwillison.net how this kind of "AI-augmented monitoring" transforms professional advisory. After 6 months of consistent intelligence sharing, clients start proactively sharing strategic context with you. You become part of their decision-making infrastructure.

This week: Set up monitoring for your top 2 clients. Run it for one week. The first time you send a relevant alert the client didn't expect, the habit will stick.

Like what you read? Get this in your inbox every Tuesday.

By subscribing, you agree to receive a weekly newsletter from Cogni6 inc. (Quebec, Canada). You can unsubscribe at any time.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

This website uses statistical and advertising measurement cookies (Google Analytics, Google Ads) to improve your experience. No retargeting. No social tracking. Privacy policy